List of scenes from the play the tragedy of Imaum Houssein
Scope & Content:
The scenes on the list are numbered one to fifty-four in the order in which they are supposed to be rehearsed. Some of the numbered scenes have pencil ticks against them, some of which match up to those scenes which feature in the published work. The reverse of the list includes a separate list...
Two original draft scenes from the play which do not feature in the final published version. The scenes are numbers two and four from the list (ff. 1-4).
Letter from Arthur Naylor Wollaston, India Office, to Sir Rutherford Alcock
Scope & Content:
Letter regarding an enclosed letter from William H Allen & Co regarding the cost of printing plates and suggesting solutions for him and Sir Lewis to consider. Enclosed letter from William H Allen & Co to Arthur Naylor Wollaston, dated 12 March 1879 regarding the cost of producing the pl...
Letter from William H Allen & Co, 13 Waterloo Place, London to Lewis Pelly
Scope & Content:
Letter updating Pelly on the printing of his book and the expectation that it will be ready by the end of May. A specimen sheet of their work thus far is also enclosed.
Letter from Arthur Naylor Wollaston, India Office to Lewis Pelly
Scope & Content:
Letter expressing his hope that Pelly will be pleased with the printed play, and stating that it is unlikely that it will be ready for 17 May. The letter also gives figures on the number of scenes, the number in type and the number struck off the list to print.
Letter from Arthur Naylor Wollaston, India Office to Lewis Pelly
Scope & Content:
Letter informing Pelly that although the printing process was sped up the play will not be ready for 17 May as errors occured which had to be corrected and therefore there are still eleven to twelve scenes left to do. The letter goes on to discuss the contents of the preface and what explanatio...
Letter from Arthur Naylor Wollaston, India Office to Lewis Pelly
Scope & Content:
Letter asking for Pelly's thoughts on the title page, and informing him that the preface is complete apart from the final portion which Birdwood [George Christopher Molesworth Birdwood] has mislaid.
