File 808-I(S)/1926 Complaints made by Darbars that Government exercises unwarrantable interference in States on behalf of British subjects and alleged British subjects, and that they have unwarrantably withdrawn from Darbars the right to exercise jurisdiction over European British subjects and servants of British Government, e.g. Postal Employees in State territories. Consideration of the question postponed until it is definitely known what the future position of the States is to be vis-a-vis...
File 49-I(C)/1933 Part 1 Representation from His Highness the Jam Saheb [Jam Sahib] of Nawanagar regarding the abrogation of the arrangements of 1917 concerning his ports. Appointment of the Court of Arbitration.
File 73-R(S)/1928 (1) Discussions with the Indian States Committee regarding the question of relationship between the Paramount Power and the Indian States. (2) Question whether the States are in relations with the British Crown through the Governor General or the Governor General in Council. (3) Position of the Government of India in supporting a Ruler against a demand of his subjects for change in the methods of the State Government.
File 73-R(S)/1928 (1) Discussions with the Indian States Committee regarding the question of relationship between the Paramount Power and the Indian States. (2) Question whether the States are in relations with the British Crown through the Governor General or the Governor General in Council. (3) Position of the Government of India in supporting a Ruler against a demand of his subjects for change in the methods of the State Government.
File 27-S(S)/1931 1. Question of the future administration of the Berars. 2. Representations made by His Exalted Highness the Nizam's Government on the subject.
File I B(S) Mar 1916 268 Despatch from the Secretary of State to the Madras Government No: 1 Secret, dated 11 February 1916 regarding Swiss Government claim against the Raja of Pudukota.