G. B. SHAW PAPERS: SERIES II. Vol. LVI (ff. i+19). 'Misalliance'; 1930? George Bernard Shaw, author: 'Misalliance': rehearsal notes by George Bernard Shaw: 1930?.
G. B. SHAW PAPERS: SERIES II. Vol. LI (ff. 203). Collection of miscellaneous material relating to plays, arranged in chronological order of the original date of composition. 1. ff. 1-47. 'Arms and the Man'; 1923-1945. i. ff. 1-8. Costume designs; line and coloured drawings; 1941? ii. f. 9....
G. B. SHAW PAPERS: SERIES I. Vol. XXXV (ff. 90). Letters to Shaw from Professor Gilbert Murray and his wife Lady Mary Murray; 1900-1950. includes: ff. 1-88v George Gilbert Aimé Murray, OM; classical scholar: Letters to G. B. Shaw of George Gilbert Aimé Murray: 19001950: Mainly typewritten.f...
Vol. III A (ff. 93); 1889-1890. At ff. 92v-80v, reading from the end, are notes for a review of F. Fyles’s and D. Belasco’s 'The Girl I Left Behind Me’; 1895. George Bernard Shaw, author: 'The Cassone': autogr. and typescript by George Bernard Shaw: 1889-1890.
G. B. SHAW PAPERS: SERIES I. Vol. XXXIV (ff. 99). Correspondence with: 1. ff. 1-30. William Morris (correspondence of and concerning); 1884-1896. Partly printed. 2. ff. 31-99. May Morris, daughter of William Morris; 1885-1913. includes: ff. 1-30 William Morris, poet and artist: Correspo...
[Portrait of George Bernard Shaw.] Photographer: Unknown
Scope & Content:
Genre: Portrait Photography Full-face head-and-shoulders portrait, wearing pince-nez. This appears to have been taken at the same sitting as print 19, but printed (or copied) later.
[Portrait of George Bernard Shaw.] Photographer: Foulsham and Banfield
Scope & Content:
Genre: Portrait Photography Full-face head-and-shoulders portrait, half-smiling. The portrait was possibly taken with the series of photographs used to illustrate the article on Shaw published in 'The Sketch' of 12 March 1902 (see f. 13 of this volume).
Genre: Portrait Photography Snapshot of George Bernard Shaw swimming, wearing a striped bathing costume. Captioned in Shaw's hand on the reverse. The print appears to have been made a good deal later than the original photograph.