Add MS 6875

Folio, folio 503. XVI and XVII century. Another volume of the same collection, containing:

Q. Original letters of Hieronymous Agocchi to Giovanni Andrea Caligario, Bishop of Bertinaro, Refendario delle due segnature, at Rome. Agocchi was nephew to Cardinal Filippo Sega, generally known as the Cardinal of Piacenza, Legate from Clement VIII to the Princes of the League in France, and whom he had accompanied, ‘ut esset omnium arcanorum particeps’. He became afterwards referendario delle due segnature, and Cardinal. These letters are all written in Italian.

1. Mentioning the safe arrival of himself, M. de Viterbo, and M. de Montorio at Nanci, and arrangements for remittances from Rome to the Cardinal di Piacenza, the Legate. The Cardinal was active in promoting union between the princes. Dated Nanci, 7 September 1592. Folio 1.

2. That he had received from the Cardinal letters of credence to the Princes, and he had a conference with the Duke (of Mayenne) of which he gives a long account. He details the proposed election of a King of France; the report of ‘Navarre's’ (Henry IV) intention to become a catholic; the various intrigues carried on; and the altered state of affairs. Dated Nancy, 9 September 1592. Folio 3.

3. That the Cardinal Gondi [Pierre de Gondi, afterwards Bishop of Paris] had arrived; and giving an account of the Cardinal's proceedings with Turenne [duc de Bouillon], Du Plessis Mornay, and others of the Huguenot Party; he also details his own interview with the Cardinal de Sans [blank], and gives a general view of affairs. The postscript describes Cardinal Gondi's interview with Bassompierre, who had Navarre's word, that he would turn catholic. Dated Nancy, 9 September 1592. Folio 7.

4. Stating that the courier, Giovanni Paranno, employed by the Cardinal di Piacenza, was unworthy of trust; and requesting that he might not in future be employed by the court of Rome. Dated Nancy, 10 September 1592. Folio 11.

5. Making observations on the conduct of Cardinal Gondi and on the instructions of the Pope for the Cardinal's intercourse with the Huguenots. Dated Nancy, 10 September 1592. Folio 13.

6. That he expected to be at Verdun in the evening. He had received the Cardinal Legate's letter to Cardinal Gondi, with His Holiness' order respecting the journey of the latter into Italy, and had requested the Duke of Lorraine to forward them to the Cardinal. He mentions the surrender of Provinen Brie to Navarre and gives a summary view of the state of affairs. Dated San Mihel [St. Michel, near Verdun], 12 September 1592. Folio 15.

7. He has been informed that the Cardinal Gondi will conform to the instructions sent to him; he had also heard from the Bishop of Verdun [Nicholas Bougher], Navarre's express declaration to the Archdeacon of Metz, that he intended to send Cardinal Gondi and Marshall Pisani to Rome. Gondi's journey to Rome was understood by Navarre's followers to be for the purpose of procuring Navarre's reception into the Catholic Church. Dated Verdun, 13th September 1592. Folio 17.

8. He describes the proceedings of Navarre, who had laid siege to Scialeothieri [Château Thierry], and gives the accounts from Flanders, and from the Cardinal di Piacenza, at Paris. Dated Verdun, 14 September 1592. Folio 19.

9. Mentioning the arrival from Spain of the Bishop of Avranches [Francois Péricard], envoy to Madrid from the late Duke of Guise; and giving the intelligence which he had brought. There were 10 agents in Madrid from various branches of the League, all wanting money, and assistance. The siege of Château Thierry did not advance, Navarre not having returned from a visit to ‘la sua Gabriella’ [Gabrielle d'Estrées, his mistress]. He had received a favourable answer from Cardinal Gondi. Dated Dun, 17 September 1592. Folio 21.

10. Mentioning the arrival and reception of the Cardinal of Seus [Nicolas de Pellevé] at Rheims, and his interview with the Duke of Mayenne etc. with their declarations. Date Soissons, 29 September 1592. Folio 23.(Another copy of this letter was sent, accompanied by other papers in cipher).

11. Giving an account of the proceedings of the Cardinal de Gondi, and of the various opinions current abroad with regard to the Cardinal's supposed mission from Henry of Navarre to Rome, and the intentions of the Pope, as to the reception of Navarre into the Catholic Church; with a report on the state of all parties. He wrote this direct to Rome, in order that the Pope might have the information sooner, than if the Legate wrote from Paris. Dated Saissons, 29 September 1592. Folio 25. [This letter is a copy, and is endorsed as having been deciphered on the 10th November. It is therefore very probably a transcript of the cipher mention in number 10]

12. Stating that he has received some letters form the Bishop, but feared that the despatches, sent via Lyons had been lost; that route being unsafe. He requests that for the future they might be sent to Bellini, at Nancy. Bellini and Todeschini did not agree, and as one must be dismissed he would rather retain Bellini. He mentions some private affairs and thanks the Bishop for the favours shewn to his brother Giov. Batt. Agocchi. Dated Soissons, 29 September 1529. Folio 29.

13. Giving an account of the bad situation of affairs at Paris, and of the inconveniences suffered by the Cardinal Legate there. Dated Soissons, October 4th 1592. Folio 31.

14. Narrating the blockade of Paris by Navarre, with his remarks on the state of affairs; nothing was now said of the assembly of the States. In the postscript he gives an account of the retreat of Navarre, ill, to St. Denis, and of the sally of the Parisians. Dated Mets [Metz?], 13 October 1592. Folio 33.

15. A duplicate of the preceding letter. Folio 35. [Letters of the same to Sigre Pietro Aldobrandini, governor of the Castle of St. Angelo at Rome [nephew to Pope Clement VIII] and created Cardinal in September 1592.]

16. Describing his journey with the Duke of Mayenne, his arrival at Rheims, and the presentation of the Spanish envoys, the Duke of Feria, Sig. Giov. Batt. di Taxis, and Don Indigo de Mendozza, to the Duke; he mentions the state of the army, and that he sent with this other despatches in cipher. Dated Soissons, 13 February 1593. Folio 37.

17. Giving a character of the Duke of Feria, and mentioning some of the proceedings of the Spanish Envoys. Dated Soissons, 17 February 1593. Folio 39. [A copy: it is endorsed and deciphered 23rd March]

18. Giving a very long account of their conferences with the Spanish Envoys, with the negotiations for the proposed marriage of the Infanta. Dated Soissons, 13 February 1593. Folio 40. [A copy: it is endorsed as deciphered 24th March, and is probably a transcript of the cipher mentioned in number 16.]

19. Describing the distribution of the money brought by the Spanish Envoys, and by Count Mansfeldt. He mentions the discontents which existed in the army, and the waste of time by the negotiations: he sends further intelligence in cipher. Dated Soissons, 18 February 1593. Folio 48.

20. An account, at great length, of his negotiations with the Spanish Envoys. Dated Soissons, 18 February 1593. Folio 50. [A copy, it is endorsed as deciphered 24 March, and is probably a transcript of the cipher mentioned in number 19.]

21. That the Duke of Mayenne and the Spanish minsters still remained at Soissons: Count Mansfeldt had arrived, but was to return to the Spanish army, in order to quiet a mutinous feeling among the troops. He had sent fuller and more important particulars yesterday in his despatches, in cipher. Dated Soissons, 22 February 1593. Folio 56.

22. Stating that he had at last discovered the real meaning of the negotiations between Mayenne and the Spanish Envoys, and the reason of the differences between them; of all which he gives an account at great length. Dated Soissons, 21 February 1593. Folio 58. [A copy; it is endorsed as deciphered 24 March, and is probably a transcript of the cipher mentioned in the preceding.]

23. Excusing the length of his despatches in cipher, by reason of the importance of the subjects. He notices the miscarriage and interception of some letters from Rome, and mentions the arrival of the Bishop of Amiens [Geofroi de la Marthonie], and a deputation from the clergy of that place, on their way to the assembly of the States General. Dated Soissons, 23 February 1593. Folio 66.

24. He continues his report of the negotiations between Mayenne and the Spanish Envoys, and on the state of the various contending parties; he also sends a copy of Mayenne's acknowledgement of the Infanta Isabella, as Queen of France. Dated Soissons, 23 February 1593. [Folio number missing] [A copy: it is endorsed as deciphered 24th March, and is apparently a transcript of the cipher mentioned in the preceding.]

25. Mentioning the arrival of Sig. Appio Conti, and the arrangements to be made with him and Sigre Malvasia, etc. respecting the French Regiment [in Papal pay?] Dated Soissons, 24 February 1593. Folio 72.

26. Referring to his letters of the 4th and 6th of this month [which are not in this collection.] He mentions that Mayenne had attempted to take Noyon by escalade, but had failed in his attempt, and was now investing it. He remarks on the state of the various parties. Dated Soissons, 12th March 1593. Folio 74.

27. A letter in cipher. Dated Soissons, 12th March 1593. Folio 76.

28. Giving an account of the proceedings of the army; the Spanish troops had refused to march to St. Denis; Count Mansfeldt obeyed the Spanish Envoys rather than Mayenne. He remarks upon Mayenne's paper of adhesion to the Infanta Isabella. Dated Soissons, 12 March 1593. Folio 78. [A copy; it is endorsed as deciphered 23rd April and is apparently a transcript of the preceding letter in cipher.]

29. Mentioning his letter of the 26th [not in this collection]. On the same day happened the death of Sigre Appio Conti; [see Volume I, letter 92]; for the particulars he refers to a letter of M. Malvasia, sent with this. The homicide Colonel was in custody, but as he was related to all the chiefs of the army, especially to Count Mansfeldt, he would probably escape. Noyon had agreed to capitulate on the following morning, if not previously relieved by Navarre. A letter from Navarre had been intercepted, but he did not believe its contents. Dated Camp before Noyon, 28 March 1593. Folio 80.

30. Remarking on the impolicy of retaining the regiment of mercenaries on Papal pay, after the death of Conti. He advises its number to be reduced to 500, or else that the Pope should subsidize 1200 French Cavalry. Dated Camp before Noyon, 28 March 1593. (A copy). Folio 82.

31. Giving an account of his conference with the Duke of Mayenne, who complained of the reduction of the Papal Regiment [see volume I, letter 92]. He also describes his differences with Sigre. Malvasia. Dated Han. 4 April 1593. Folio 84.

32. He mentions the flight of the Colonel to whom Conti owed his death, and makes observations upon it. The blockade of Paris had been raised by Navarre. Dated Han. 6 April, 1593. Folio 88.

33. He describes the strong remonstrances made to him on the disbanding of the mercenaries in the Pope's pay, and on the use made by Navarre of the circumstance, in reporting, that the Pope was neutral in the cause. For the public good it was necessary that this report should be contradicted. Dated Han. 7 April, 1593. Folio 92.

34. Mentioning the departure of the German mercenaries of the Pope's regiment, who refuse to re-enter the service, and giving an account of the conference of himself and Sigre Malvasia with the Duke of Mayenne and the other chiefs of the League. He enters into pecuniary arrangements, and describes his differences thereupon with Malvasia [the Pope's Commissary General in France.] He adds a copy of the bond of indemnity, which he had given to Malvasia. Dated Han. 15 April 1593. (A copy). Folio 94.

35. The original, in Agocchi's own hand, of the preceding letter. Folio 99.

36. A duplicate copy of the same letter, with autograph signature and address. Folios 103, 104

37. Giving intelligence from Paris, and an account of the dismay cause there by the disbanding of the Papal troops. It would now be impossible for the state to proceed to the election of a King; their strongest ally having apparently withdrawn from them. He had heard from the Legate respecting the proceedings which he had taken, in order to allay the ferment, and was instructed by him to request Mayenne's advance to relieve Paris. He gives an account of his conference with Mayenne and the other chiefs, as to the mode of action to the pursued. They resolved to await the arrival of the Duke of Lorraine. Dated Reins, 20 April, 1593. Folios 107, 109.

38. Stating that the Duke of Lorraine had not arrived, as was respected. He hoped God would interfere, and they the Congress might assemble, which the Devil had hindered. He sends further news in cipher. Dated Reins, 22 April, 1593. Folio 111.

39. Giving an account of the intrigues which he had discovered to be carried on by means of Hieronymo Gondi between Navarre and some of the Princes of the League, especially the Duke of Lorraine, which accounted for his non arrival, when expected. He gives an account also of the views entertained by Mayenne; with his own remarks upon them. Date Reims, 22 April, 1593. Folio 113. [A copy: it is endorsed as deciphered 21st May: and is probably a transcript of the cipher alluded to in the preceding letter]

40. Mentioning the arrival of the Duke of Mayenne, and giving an account of the conference held with him. Mayenne had assembled a council of the Princes, and had laid before them a full account of the present state of affairs. A strict bond of union was determined on, and no treaty was to be entered into with the Heretic. He gives an account of a letter from the Duke of Sessa to Don Diego, intercepted by Navarre. He had remonstrated with Mayenne of the favour shewn to Sciatobrin [Chateaubriand], the antagonist of Conti. He sent further news in the accompanying cipher. Dated Reins, 30 April, 1593. Folio 118.

41. Stating that the Duke of Lorraine denied having entered into treaty with Navarre, by means of Gondi, and accounted for his conduct. He remarks at length upon the various contingencies that may occur in affairs. Dated Reyms, 30 April, 1593. Folio 122. [A copy: it is endorsed as deciphered 21st May, and is probably a transcript of the cipher mentioned in the preceding]

42. On the vacillation of the Duke of Lorraine. He had assured him that rather than recognize Navarre as King, the Pope would suffer martyrdom. Mayenne had again assured him, that neither he nor Lorraine would come to terms with Navarre. He mentions the insecure state of affairs, and the little confidence to be placed in the professions of the union of the Princes. Dated Reyms, 3 May 1593. Folio 127. [A copy: it is endorsed as deciphered 21 May]

43. Stating that he had been ordered by the Cardinal Legate to proceed to Flanders; he had endeavoured previously, in conjunction with Taxis, to ascertain the intentions of the Duke of Mayenne. The Duke believed that if Villars should surrender Rouen, there would exist no other way of safety for himself, than to give in his adhesion to Navarre, but always with the hope of exciting a new war, and another and firmer league, of which he propounded a scheme; himself to be at the head. Mayenne had applied to many; to St. Pol in particular, who had arrive at Soissons, and still had hopes of making head against Navarre, but from what he (St. Pol) had heard from Mayenne, inclined him also to accept Navarre's terms; - ‘He was one who would sell himself to the best bidder.’ The writer gives a further account of the designs of Taxis, St. Pol, and Mayenne, and of his own policy towards them. Mayenne would take no decided part, until the return of Taxis and Agocchi from Flanders. Dated Soissons, 12th March, 1594. Folio 131. [This letter is addressed to Cardinal Aldobrandini. Pietro Aldobrandini, the same to whom the preceding letters are addressed, was created Cardinal (having arrived at 22 years of age) on the 17th September 1593 by Clement, his uncle.]

44. Stating that he had arrived at Brussels, in order to confer, by the Cardinal Legate's desire, with the Archduke Ernest. He had communicated all his views to Sigre Malvasia, with whom he now was. Dated Brussels, 25 March, 1594. Folio 143.

45. Stating that he and Malvasia had had an audience of the Archduke, and had since memorialized him. He mentions the difficulties attendant upon the negotiation. Letters were brought to the Archduke from Villars at Rouen, with proposals, which shew that he also must be dearly purchased, to serve the cause of the Religion. For other matters he refers to the despatches of Sigre Malavasia. Dated Brussels, 27 March, 1594. Folio 143

46. Giving an account of the entry of Navarre into Paris, by means of the Count of Brissae and the Provost des Marchands, with whom Mayenne was suspected of having acted in concert. The Spanish troops had departed. The Cardinal Legate remained for a time in Paris. He had received no letters from him, since the surrender. He relates what particulars he had heard of Navarre's entry. It was said that Mayenne proposed a truce for three months. Dated Brussels, 3 April, 1594. Folio 147.

47. Stating that he had arrived at Nancy, pursuant to the Legate's directions. He had heard from the Cardinal of Lorraine, with the Dukes of Mayenne and Guise, were to be at Bar le Duc. He intended to go there immediately. It was said that since he left Brussels, Rouen, Hâvre de Grace and other places under Villars, were surrendered to Navarre, and that some towns in Champagne had followed their example. Dated Nancy, 13 April, 1594. Folio 151.

R. Original letter of Giovanni Francesco Morosini, Bishop of Brescia, while Nuncio in France, from August 1587 to April 1588, addressed to Cardinal Hieronymo Rusticucci, Secretary of State to Pius V Gregory XIII and Sixtus V successively. On his return from this mission Morosini was created Cardinal by Sixtus V in July 1588. The whole are in Italian.

48. Giving an account of his arrival and reception at Paris, and of his interview with the King (Henry III) to whom he had presented the Pope's brief. He sends further particulars, in cipher. [These particulars are wanting.] Dated Paris, 3 August 1587. Folio 153.

49. He had had an audience of the Queen Mother [Catherine de' Medici], and afterwards of the King, of which he gives an account, he refers also to other details, in cipher, which are now wanting. Dated Paris, 4th August 1587. Folio 156.

50. That he had heard, through the Queen Mother, from the Duke of Lorraine, and also from the Duke of Guise, that the enemy had entered Lorraine in great force, but were repulsed. The King was levying forces, and had created four Marshalls, but was in great want of money. Navarre had quitted Rochelle, and, having joined Condé and Turenne, had forced the Duke of Joyeux to abandon Poitou. The writer then gives other reports on various subjects. Dated Paris, 17 August 1587. Folio 160.

51. That he had had an audience of the King and the Queen Mother, and had enforced the visitation of the Bishops. He had also requested the liberation, in the Pope's name of Thomas Morgan, an Englishman, imprisoned at the request of the pretended Queen of England. He mentions his proceedings in several matters relating to the Bishop and Canons of Cambray, to the Cardinal of Sens, etc. He had remonstrated with the King for proposing, in such dearth of money, to spend 70,000 crowns in jewels for Epernon's marriage, the King however denied any such intention other despatches are mentioned by the writer, as enclosed, which are now wanting. Dated Paris, 17 August 1587. Folio 164. [See L'Etoile, Journal de Henri IV volume. iii., pages 260, 261 and Colt MSS Calig C. IX. and Titus B. viii. For a later notice of Morgan (in 1605) see Thuani Hist. page CXXXVI §§ 6, 7.]

52. Stating that the Duke of Nemours had mentioned his intention of joining the Dukes of Lorraine and Guise, who were on the eve of the battle with a strong force of the Huguenots. He noticed the King's preparations for the campaign, and intimates, that his intentions were doubted by many. Dated Paris, 30 August 1587. Folio 168.

53. Giving an account of the defeat of the Swiss, near Grenoble in Dauphiny, by La Nalette [brother of the Duke of Epernon.] Dated Paris, 30 August 1587. Folio 170. [viz. Thuani Hist. page 88 § 2.]

54. Mentioning the arrival, and registry by the Parliament, of a bull for alienating 50,000 crowns in rental of ecclesiastical property: it was approved by the Syndics of the Clergy; Villeroy had been sent to thank him for the favour shewn by the Pope, in granting the bull. Morgan was liberated, and had expressed his thanks to him. He mentions the affairs of the Cardinal of Sens, and of the Bishop and Canons of Cambray, respecting the restitution of their several temporalities. He narrates his conversation with Villeroi, on the King's proposed campaign, and union with the Catholic Princes. His interview with the Cardinals of Bourbon and Vendôme. The Bishop of Chalous presents a letter of credence to him from the Duke of Guise. Dated Paris, 30 August 1587. Folio 172.

55. His congratulations on the victory in Dauphiny. The King had promised to take the field by the 15th. He gives other particulars of the audience which he had had. The Ambassadors of Spain and Scotland have also had audiences, to the displeasures of the English Ambassador. The King says ‘questa furia’ ‘that fury’ (Queen Elizabeth) wished to quarrel, on account of Morgan's liberation, but he [Morosini] thought the ambassador's aim was to detect any union between the King, the Pope, and Spain. The ambassador's suspicions had been roused by the elevation of Allen to the people. Dated Paris, September 1 1587. Folio 176.

56. Stating that a courier had just arrived in great haste, with accounts of a successful attack by M. M. De Rhon and Della Rotta on the German troopers, commanded by Hans Bech. Dated Paris, September 1, 1587. Folio 178.

57. Stating that the King had given him audience, previous to setting out for the army. In his absence, he was to communicate with the Queen Mother. The King had again thanked him for the alienation of Church property, which had been granted, but as the collection would require time, he had requested a loan on that security of 300,000 crowns from the Pope. Morosini had answered that the Pope would rather furnish troops, which offer was declined, and the loan pressed. The King's object in joining the army was to prevent Navarre's passage of the Loire, and junction with the Germans. He had received an evasive answer, with regard to enforcing the Episcopal Visitations. Dated Paris, 14 September 1587. Folio 180.

58. A duplicate of the preceding. Folio 184.

59. Stating that the Germans had offered battle, which, against the will of the Duke of Guise, is declined by the Catholics, who had now retreated; and the King had ordered the bridges on the Seine to be fortified. The Germans were about to be reinforced. The Swiss cantons had decreed a force of 10,000 in order to arrange the defeat and death of the 4,000 in Dauphiny. The King reached the army on the 17th. Montpensier was refused admittance into Blés. The Queen Mother and the nobility joined in the procession of the King's penitents for success. Dated Paris, 19 September 1587. Folio 188.

60. Stating that he had been requested to join the Commissioner for the alienation. He had had an audience of the Queen Mother, who had given the King's acceptance of the Pope's offer of troops to assist him. The King had requested, and their commanders, the Grand Master of Malta and the Marquis Giacomo Malatesta, and still pressed very earnestly for the loan of 300,000 crowns. He [Morosini] had promised, that the Pope would send troops, but their numbers and their commanders were to be at his own discretion. He had again refused the money. Dated Paris, 27 September 1587. Folio 190.

61. Giving an account of the meeting, at the Cardinal de Bourbon's; of the Commissioners named in the Pope's bull of alienation; they could not act in the absence of the Cardinal de Guise and the two syndics of the clergy, who had been written to, although their presence was not to be expected, since they denied the power of the Pope to issue the bull. Dated Paris, 22 September 1587. Folio 194.

62. Stating that the Cardinal de Bourbon had received intelligence of the proceedings of the army from the Duke of Guise, which he had communicated to him [Morosini]. Other intelligence had also been brought to him from various quarters. He enclosed another letter from Guise to the Cardinal de Bourbon [this is now wanting]. Dated Paris, 22 September 1587. Folio 196.

63. It was reported, that the King had moved to Romovantin, between Orleans and Bruges, in order to join Joyeuse, and give battle to Navarre: others say, in order to accommodate matters. The 1000 Swiss levied for his service, were gone to Burgundy at Mayenne's instigation, who hope that the King would give the command to his [Mayenne's] brother, the Duke of Guise. The King of Navarre was, it was reported, on the Loire, but had retreated to Poitou: there were various reports of the advance of the Germans. Dated Paris, 27 September 1587. Folio 200.

64. Stating that he had received a letter from the King, requesting his influence, in seconding the application, which he [the King] had made for a Cardinal's hat for M. de Candale. Dated Paris, 27 September 1587. Folio 202.

65. That he had received the Cardinal's letters of the 7th September and had written to thank the King, in the name of his Holiness, for the liberation of Morgan, and the restitution of the temporalities of the Cardinal of Sens. Dated Paris, 11 October 1587. Folio 204.

66. Stating that the Duke of Mercœur, in the name of the Queen Mother, had desired that he, in conjunction with the Cardinal de Bourbon, would carry the Pope's Bull into effect, without the Cardinal of Guise: or the syndics of the clergy. He gives the substance of a conference, to which the latter had been invited with him [Morosini] and the Cardinal of Bourbon. In the end the Cardinal of Bourbon proposed to exchange the annual rent of 500,000 scudi, which had been granted, for a donative of 600,000 scudi, which the Queen Mother had formally demanded at a meeting of all the clergy then in Paris. Dated Paris, 11 October 1587. Folio 208.

67. Stating that Navarre had retreated upon La Rochelle and St. Jean d'Augely, and the King to Pluviers, leaving Joyeuse with a force, to prevent Navarre's junction with the Germans, and sending Marshal Biron to request assistance from the Parliament. He gives an account of the state of the various parties, and refers to further particulars in cipher [which are now wanting]. Date Paris, 12 October 1587. Folio 210.

68. Since sealing the last, the Bishop of Paris had been to say, that if the Bull were annulled, the assembled clergy would grant the King 500,000 scudi, to be paid by instalments, but that on applying to the merchants, who were to find the funds, they could not obtain an advance of the money. He supposed therefore, that on the morrow the Queen Mother would insist upon the execution of the bull. Dated Paris, 12 October 1587. Folio 214.

69. Stating that Marshall Biron had come to him, in the King's name, with large promises of His Majesty's vigilance and activity in the war, if his ‘greatness of Soul’ were not hampered by want of money and had mentioned the expected junction of Guise, Schomberg, and Bassompierre, with troops. The King was at Montargis. He [Morosini] wished to make a sure game, that the King would unite with the Duke of Lorraine and all the house of Guise. He gives an account of his conference with Biron, and of the general state of affairs. Dated Paris, 15 October 1587. Folio 216.

70. Giving an account of the movements of the forces of all the various contending parties. Dated Paris, 25 October 1587. Folio 220.

71. Stating that he had been sent for to attend the Queen Mother in council, who, in the King's name, had insisted upon the execution of the bull. He had proposed that the King should be advised to accept, in lieu of the bull, the sum of 400,000 scudi from the clergy; which the syndics, in the presence of the council, promised to pay. He gives an account of his conference the next day with the syndics, and of his remonstrances with them, for having at all opposed the execution of the Pope's bull. Dated Paris, 25 October 1587. Folio 222.

72. A duplicate of the preceding letter. Folio 226.

73. Stating that news had just arrived of the death of the Duke of Joyeuse, and of his younger brother, defeated in battle. It was reported that Condé also was dead, which would be some, though small consolation. Dated Paris, 30 October 1587. Folio 230.

74. On the discontents of the Swiss mercenaries. The King had sent troops to the vicinity of Paris, to the displeasure of the inhabitants, whom, however, the Queen Mother had reassured. He states the situation of the forces of the various parties. The King had written to Joyeuse's brother, to quit the Capucin order, and to return to his rank, but had been refused. The report of Condés death was false. Dated Paris, 9 November 1587. Folio 232. [See Cayet, Chronol. Septen. pp. 76, 77]

75. On the difficulties of the clergy, in raising the money. The Queen Mother pressed the execution of the Bull. He had proposed to state the question to the Pope. He gives an account of his conference with the Queen Mother. Dated Paris, 9 November 1587. Folio 236.

76. Saying that the roads not being safe, he had enclosed duplicates of his letters dated 25th, 29th and 30th of October. Dated Paris, 10 November 1587. Folio 240.

77. Stating that he had received the Cardinal's letters of the 17th & 19th containing the Pope's answer, respecting the succours requested, and had communicated them to the Queen Mother. He gives the substance of a long conference which he had had with her. Dated Paris, 10 November 1587. Folio 242.

78. Mentioning that he had heard that the King had written to the Dukes of Lorrain and Guise, to join their forces with his. Information had been given by a prisoner from Navarre's army, that his mercenaries would abandon him, if not paid in a few days. Dated Paris, 13 November 1587. Folio 246.

79. Stating that a messenger had brought him a letter from the King, requesting him to write in favour of an application made to the Pope, for a dispensation to allow the Grand Prior of Toulouse, brother of the late Duke of Joyeuse, to marry; all the surviving members of that family being ecclesiastics. Dated Paris, 21 November 1587. Folio 248.

80. A duplicate of the preceding. Folio 250.

81. Stating that the Cardinal of Vendome had been with him, to lament his brother's, the Count de Soissons, adoption of Navarre's party. He adds remarks on several affairs of an ecclesiastical nature. Dated Paris, 22 November 1587. Folio 252.

82. Giving an account of military proceedings, and of the situation of the forces of the various contending parties. He enclosed a copy of the King's answer to his letter on the death of the Duke of Joyeuse. Dated Paris, 22 November 1587. Folio 256.

83. An Italian translation of the King's letter to Morosini, referred to in the preceding. Dated at the Camp of Gurgio, 3 November 1587. Folio 258.

84. Stating that since making up his last packet, he had received a message from the Queen Mother, requesting him to enforce the application for a dispensation to allow the Grand Prior of Toulouse to marry. Dated Paris, 22 November 1587. Folio 259.

85. A duplicate of the preceding. Folio 261.

86. Giving the substance of the proceedings at a meeting with the syndics of the clergy, respecting the bull for alienating some of the church property, and the Pope's brief nominating new Commissioners in the matter. Dated Paris, 23 November 1587. Folio 263.

87. A copy of a letter from the Duke of Guise to the Queen Mother, giving an account of an action in which the S. de Vins was defeated. Dated 22 November. Folio 265. [This appears to have been enclosed in the following from Morosini.]

88. Giving an account of the same victory over the German Troopers. Dated Paris, 25 November 1587. Folio 267.

89. Giving further details of the action, with his conjectures on the mode of retreat of the remaining troopers and lanzknechts. Dated Paris, 28 November 1587. Folio 269.

90. Inclosing duplicates of his last two letters. The King was rapidly advancing to join the Duke of Guise. The remaining German troopers were proceeding to join Navarre, of whom there was no certain intelligence. Dated Paris, 2 December 1587. Folio [no number]

91. Copies, in Italian, of three papers, viz:

i. A letter from Henry III to the Parliament of Paris, congratulating them on the victory, and commending the conduct of the Duke of Espernon. Folio 274.

ii. Letter from the same to M. de Lausac, on the same subject. Folio 274.

iii. Articles agreed upon between the Duke of Bouillon, the Baron Dona, the Rittmasters, etc. as commanders of the foreign troops. Dated 5 December 1587. Folio 275.

92. Stating that he had received his Eminence's letter, with the pacquet inclosed for the Prince of Lusignon on sending it to the Prince, he found he had returned to Italy. He therefore returned the pacquet to H.E. Dated Paris, 28 December 1587. Folio 278.

93. Giving an account of the King's triumphal entry into Paris. The King proposed to take the field against Navarre in the beginning of April. Dated Paris, 4 January 1588. Folio 280.

94. Stating that he had received His Eminence's letter of the 18th December via Spain, with the cipher, the bull, the medals, etc. The deputies of the clergy had offered the King 500,000 scudi, in lieu of the alienation of church property. He hoped the King would accept this offer. The troops of Guise had followed the retreat of the Swiss, and afterwards ravaged the country about Montbelliard, which was favourable to the heretics. Guise and the Prince of Lorraine had returned to their homes. The King was a Vincennes, and would return to Paris tomorrow: he was always requesting money from his ministers, in order to prosecute the campaign. Dated Paris, 31 January 1588. Folio 282.

95. Stating that the envoys sent by the King to the Dukes of Guise and Lorraine, had returned; they had been only to obtain from their vague declarations of obedience to his Majesty. They were waiting the result of the meeting of the Chiefs of the League, at Soissons, for which place the Cardinals of Bourbon and Vendome, with many of the nobility, had set out. He mentions other minor circumstances. Dated Paris, 10 April, 1588. Folio 284.

96. Stating that the court were still waiting for the result of the assembly of Soissons. He mentions the precautions taken against disturbances in Paris. Dated Paris, 25 April 1588. Folio 286.

RR. Transcripts of letters written in cipher by Gaspard Silingardo, Bishop of Modena, nuncio in France, 1599-1601. These letters were most probably addressed to the Papal Secretary of State. They were all in Italian.

97. Stating, that although he did not believe all that he heard, yet he thought it but right to notice what appeared of consequence. He had been given to understand, that France, being divided into three classes, Ecclesiastics, Nobility and people, it had been proposed that all three should petition the King [Henry IV] to remarry, in order that he might have a lawful successor; that in fact, two classes had so petitioned, and that measures were being taken by the means of the Cardinal Gondi, to induce the clergy to do so likewise, for the purpose of forcing His Holiness to declare the present marriage null & void, which if he should refuse to do, it should be so declared without the authority of the Pope, but with the consent of all the Bishops of France. All the appeared to be scarcely credible, but it was of great consequence, and he wished to be instructed thereupon. Dated Paris, 8th May, 1599. Folio 288. [Deciphered 11 June]

98. Stating that the Cardinal of Surdi [Francois d' Escoubleau, Cardinal of Sourdis], had been, to inform him of what took place at a meeting of the clergy in the house of Cardinal of Gondi, where the latter had informed them of the King's desire that they should petition him to remarry. He mentions the reply of the Archbishop of Aix [Paul Hurault de l'Hôpital.] He [the nuncio] had had a conference with the Cardinal of Gondi, who explained to him the King's wishes. He found that the wish for the King's marriage was universal; he heard that the Prelates wished for a short delay. The Cardinal of Gondi had told them, that the King intended to be remarried within four months. Dated 17 May, 1599. Folio 290. [Deciphered 11 June]

99. Stating that the Cardinal of Gondi had been with him, and had told him, that although the case of the nullity of the King's marriage ought to be decided rather by the decrees of the Council of Trent and the ordinary, yet through respect to the Pope, it had been deferred to him. He [the nuncio] dissented from this; he heard that the Cardinal, who appeared to manage the affair, had said as much to others. The Gondi family wished to bring the Principles of Florence [Mary de'Medici] into France, for their own interest, and the marriage appeared to be in progress before his Holiness' decision was known. Dated 30 May 1599. Folio 292. [Deciphered 21 June. This letter is much injured by the corrosion of the ink]

100. Stating that ‘his Majesty had returned to his vomit of carnal things’, being enamoured of the young daughter of the Governor of Orleans. She had shewn herself wiser than Gabrielle, not having consented to the King's wishes, till she had obtained from him a promise of marriage, in the event of her pregnancy. He reasons on the probable consequences of this promise. Gondi, who so lately was expecting to conduct into France the Princess of Tuscany, now spoke but coldly of the King's marriage. Dated Paris, 14 June 1599. Folio 294. [Deciphered 19 July]

101. Stating that the Bishop Lascurence (of Lescar) in the Principality of Bearn, had visited him, and on being asked respecting the state of religion in that country, he evaded the question, but when pressed as to what had been done, in pursuance of the treaty of absolution, he said that he was directed by the King to come to congratulate him [the nuncio] on the restoration of religion in that state. He confessed that it made but small progress, and he gave the nuncio, on promise of secrecy, a copy of the King's Edict. He [the nuncio] therefore wished to have instructions how to act towards the King in this matter. Dated 14 Jun, 1599. Folio 296. Deciphered 19 July.

102. Stating his opinion that, if the Pope should decide to declare the King's marriage null, it would be well to require as a condition the recall of the Jesuits. The King was so desirous to marry, he was likely to grant it. He [the nuncio] considered the return of the Jesuits very necessary; there were many enemies [to the Papal See], especially the Parliament. Presents of jewels were being prepared to be sent to Florence. Dated Paris, 18 July, 1599. Folio 298. Deciphered 6 August.

103. Stating that he had heard that Las Rochelle had accepted the Mass, on condition, that in three months' time, Huguenot preaching should be established in all cities and places of France. He heard also, that the Mass was accepted in one part only of the city of La Rochelle. Dated 20 August 1599. Folio 300. Deciphered 17 September.

104. On the state of religion on France, on the vacant Sees; and on the steps that it would be advisable to take, in order to revive religion. Dated 2 September 1599. Folio 302.

105. Stating that the King had been at Paris, since his departure from Blois: He [the nuncio] had not therefore been able to arrange with him; respecting the recall of the Jesuits. The ministers however had promised their assistance. The King was greatly averse to the Jesuits, but still he [the nuncio] did not despair. Much might be done with the King, but for the heretics, who were always about him. Dated 10 October 1599. Folio 304. Deciphered 14 November.

106. Giving an account of the audience which he had had of the King at St. Germain, on the 3rd when he presented the Pope's letter, respecting the league. Dated Paris, 6 November 1599. Folio 306.

107. Stating that he had been visited by a Scotch gentleman, living near Avignon, who arrived yesterday from Scotland, on his way to Rome, and had told him [the nuncio], that the King began to know the truth, and thought of becoming a Catholic, though not directly, on account of the interests of England. He said that he had conversed in Scotland with the King, and was proceeding to Rome to treat on his behalf with his Holiness. He had promised to leave with him [the nuncio] a letter written by the King, in reply to a letter of the nuncio of Flanders. If he did so, he [the nuncio] would in confidence send it to Rome. He had thought it right to send this information. The Scotch gentleman told him, that the King desired this affair to be conducted very secretly. He adds that many Scotch came to Paris, to abjure, and then came to him for benediction. He always received them in a very friendly manner. Dated Paris, 10 November 1599. Folio 308.Deciphered 10 December. See Butler's Hist. of the Catholics, volume iii, p. 271 and Kennett's Hist. of England volume ii, page 666.

108. Stating that the Scotch gentleman (who lived at Avignon, and was named Edward Drummond) had again called upon him, to tell him, that he had heard for certain the Queen of England, suspecting that the King of Scotland was in treaty with his Holiness, had resolved to send Il Signor di Grai an Englishman, to Rome with forged letters, addressed in the name of the King to His Holiness, in order to discover by this trick, if her suspicions were true. This Gentleman however had informed him of it, and he sent word, in order that if the Queen's messenger should come, caution might be used, for fear of placing the King in an unpleasant situation. Dated Paris, 29 November 1599. Folio 310. Deciphered 28 December.

109. Mentioning that he had heard in Provence, that the King had published an edict for liberty of conscience. The Duke of Guise thought it was probably true. He had therefore set out, in order to arrive before any other innovation was made. He had heard that Mda Gabrielle was dead, to the great grief of the King. Dated ............ 99. Folio 312.Deciphered 25th .............

110. Stating that M. D'Alincurt, son of Mons. de Villeroi, was gone to Rome, to thank His Holiness for his sentence of nullity of marriage, and to ask advice respecting the King's proposed marriage. He could not but advise His Holiness to ratify the contract with the Princess of Florence, for fear the King should do worse, viz. marry a heretic, or else Mde. d'Entragues. Dated Paris, 6 January 1600. Folio 314.Deciphered 17th February

111. Stating that Sigr. Gondi had informed him that the King had signed the treaty of marriage with the Grand Duke's agent; the Grand Duke gave the King 350,000 crowns, and remitted 250,000 crowns of debt, in all 600,000 crowns. An ambassador from Venice was at Paris. He gives his surmises as to the subject of his policy. Cardinal Gondisaid that perhaps something might be done in the matter of the Jesuits, but not in that of allowing the publication of the Council of Trent. Dated Paris, 13 March, 1600. Folio 316. Deciphered 14 April.

112. Stating that he would obey His Holiness instructions, respecting M. della Tamoglia. He augured badly for the state of France from the conduct of the King, who appeared to hold as much of more with the heretics than the Catholics. Dated Paris, 23 March 1600. Folio 318. Deciphered 14 August.

113. Stating that he had heard that the King would request the consent of the Congregation of the Clergy held this day at the Cardinal of Gondi's house, to an alienation of Church property, to the amount of 200,000 crowns per annum. He thought it would be refused, and he was of opinion that it should be rejected at Rome. The Church of France was already nearly ruined by such extractions. He suspected that the scheme originated with Rosini [Sully]; the heretic superintendent of the finances. Dated Paris, 27 May, 1600. Folio 320. Deciphered 16th June.

114. Stating that he had received from Paris His Eminence's pacquet, with the cipher of the Confederation of the Squizzari, and not being able to see the King, he had taxed the Chancellor with it, who denied the existence of any such confederation, and said laughingly, it was an invention of the Duke of Savoy. He would speak to the King as soon as he could obtain an audience, and would write the results. Dated Lyons, 8 August 1600. Folio 322. Deciphered 26 August.

115. Stating that the Archduke had sent an ambassador extraordinary to Paris, and although the precise nature of his embassy had not transpired, yet from conversation he had learned, that it was to complain of the French being allowed to go to Flanders; for that if they had not, Maurice would have been beaten in the last engagement. He complains that the King has an ambassador to the heretics there, and receives on from them. The Spanish Ambassador also complained of this. Dated Lyons, 18 September 1600. Folio 324.Deciphered 7th October at Florence.

116. A duplicate of number 115. Deciphered 11 October.

117. Mentioning that he had been informed, that the governor of Borge [Bourg?] who was also the King's commandant in Navarre, was on obstinate heretic, and although he constantly promised to become a Catholic, it was only to appease the Cardinal. Knowing the promise which the King had made. He had written to the King on this and similar subjects. Dated 28 April, 1601. Folio 328. Deciphered 14 May.

118. Observing with respect to the accrediting of Ladighiera [François de Bonne, Duke of Lesdigmières] to the Duke of Savoy, that if the Duke would not agree to what had been done, and which seemed just, by the deputies, it would take a long time to settle, as no one was at Lyons on his part, and the President Giannino [Jeannin], one of the judges in the case, was 100 leagues off. He advised that the Duke should be persuaded to agree to what had been done. Dated Lyons, 30 April, 1601. Folio 330. Deciphered 14 May.

S. Transcripts of letters written in cipher by Roberto Ubaldini, Bishop of Monte Pelicano, [afterwards Cardinal:] nuncio in France, in the year 1614. These letters were most probably addressed to Scipione Caffarelli, Cardinal Borghese, nephew of Pope Paul V? The whole are in Italian.

119. Narrating the proceedings of Pernone [Jean-Louis de Nogaret de la Valette, Duke of Espernon], with the administrators of the Bishopric of Metz. Dated Paris 28 January 1614. Folio 332. Deciphered 17 February.

120. Stating that the Prince of Condi and his confederates were levying forces in Liege and Lorraine, and circulating calumnies against the Queen [Mary de' Medici], who also had resolved to take up arms, but had previously offered terms of reconciliation, and had invited the Princes to Paris. The Queen had confined Vendome to his room; her prudence was to be commended in this, but not her piety, in proceeding with the treaty of marriage with England. He gives an account of his conference with her thereupon. Succours were offered to her against Condé. He makes remarks on the state of affairs, and advises that the Pope should write to the King [Louis XIII] and Queen Marshal Ladighiera [Lesdiguieres] had sent to assure their Majesties of his loyalty; an event of great moment at this time. Dated Paris, 13 February 1614. Folio 336. Deciphered 13 March.

121. Stating that a civil war was on the point of breaking out, if Nevers did not surrender the fortress of Mesiers to the Queen in a few days. He remarkes on the policy observed towards Spain. He gives an account of his conference with the Queen, who decided upon assembling the State General. Dated Paris, 25 February 1614. Folio 339. Deciphered 16 March.

122. Stating that he had always thought the league between the Grisons and Venetians of little use to the Holy See, and when he could do so covertly, he always opposed it. The French had now set it aside. He enclosed a copy of the answer of the Grisons to the Venetian Ambassador. Dated Paris, 13 March, 1614. Folio 342. Deciphered 24 March.

123. He remarks on the differences between the Dukes of Mantua and Savoy, which there was a prospect of reconciling. Dated Paris, 13 March 1614. Folio 344. Deciphered 24 March.

124. Remarking that the prospect of a civil war was nearer, as Nevers would not surrender Mesieres, and the Queen must use force. It was to be lamented, as the Princes were confederated and joined with the Huguenots. The President de Thou had been sent to them, and was expected back. He remarks on the situation of parties: his advice to the Queen, a letter from Condé had been intercepted, by which his designs were made apparent. Bouillon [Turenne] was the prime mover of the troubles. The nuncio at Cologne had informed him, that they [the Princes] had had to levy men in Liège. With respect to the English match, Don Incio had told him [Ubaldini] in confidence, that Villeroi had assured him in her Majesty's name, that she had not yet agreed to it, and that she would not conclude it without previously informing him [Ubaldini] of it. He feared that the English seeing the French in trouble, would require possession of her daughter at once. For his own part, he would not believe till he saw it, that the Queen would ever consent, till her daughter was marriageable. However necessity did great things. He should continue to watch diligently. News was come, that Vendome had possessed himself of three places in Bretagne. The alternative now was an insecure peace or a dreadful war. Dated Paris, 13 March, 1614. Folio 346. Deciphered 24 March.

125. Stating that a courier had arrived from De Thou Condé was not indisposed to come to term, nor were the others averse. Mesiers would be surrendered, on condition that one of the three was appointed governor. They persisted in demanding a convocation of the states, but to be held in a secure place. Dated Paris, 14 March, 1614. Folio 349. Deciphered 10 April.

126. Stating that a courier had arrived from Spain, with eh rejection of the terms proposed respecting, Nav rre. He remarks on the proposed Spanish match, and the policy to be pursued towards Spain. There appeared a prospect of avoiding the war: Condé and the others had agreed to meet the Queen's Envoys at Soissons. Dated Paris, 25 March, 1614. Folio 351. Deciphered 15 April.

127. Giving an account of the conference at Soissons. The Princes demanded three things, viz. arms to be laid down; the States to be convoked: the King's marriage to be deferred, till he would be of age. As to the first, there would be no difficulty, the Princes doing the same; on the second both parties were agreed; the difficulty would lie in the last. He gives the reasons for it. His advice had been asked by Villeroi, as to what the Queen should do. The Cardinal of Gioiosa [Joyeuse] had displeased the Queen, by not attending the conference, where his presence would have been of use. Dated Paris, 10 April, 1614. Folio 354. Deciphered 7 May.

128. Giving some particulars respecting the French troops in Holland; he understood that the Duke of Savoy was about to lay down arms. The match with England was now spoken of but coldly. Dated Paris, 23 October 1614. Folio 356. Deciphered 20 November.

129. Stating that as all the deputies were now assembling, he was using all his endeavours to enforce the publication of the Council of Trent. The Third Estate was very violent against the Jesuits. Dated Paris, 23 October 1614. Deciphered 20th November.

130. Giving a general view of the state of affairs. Dated Paris, 4 November 1614. Folio 360. Deciphered 26 November.

131. Stating that letters were come from the Duke of Memoransi [Montmorency], to mention his departure for Montpelier, in order to give assistance; of which the Queen approved. She had written to l'Adighiera [Lesdiguières], respecting the Huguenots. Dated Paris, 4 November, 1614. Folio 362. Deciphered 26 November.

132. Giving an account of some of the proceedings in the assembly of the States. A proposition was made to establish the authority of councils over the Pope, which had been refuted by Cardinal Rosciafoco [Rochefoucauld]. He was endeavouring, at the Queen's desire, to gain over the Duke of Nevers. Dated Paris, 20 November 1614. Folio 364. Deciphered 16 December.

133. Respecting the affairs of Savoy. He mentions the instructions sent to Ramboglietto [Rambouillet], to enforce the Duke of Savoy's observance of the conditions named by France, as mediator between him, the Duke of Mantua, and Spain, to which last country, in default of such observance, he would be suffered to fall a prey. Savoy was seeking every where for assistance, and had even offered to England to allow of heretic preachers: this last could scarcely be believed, were it not of one who had also applied to the Turks. Dated Paris, 20 November 1614. Folio 366. Deciphered 16 December.

134. Respecting the reception of the Council of Trent by the States General. Dated Paris, 2 December 1614. Folio 368. Deciphered 24 December.

135. Stating that a courier had arrived from Rambouillet, with an account of the treaty negociated by him and the nuncio Savella, between the Dukes of Savoy and Mantua; which displeased all parties at Paris. Dated Paris, 2 December 1614. Folio 370. Deciphered 24 December.

136. Stating that the French deputies sent to Spain, to arrange concerning Navarre, were returned; the treaty would be ratified. His Holiness' interference had been of great service. He describes his exertions towards hastening the marriages with Spain. Dated 2 December 1614. Folio 372. Deciphered 24 December.

137. Stating that the Prelates had resolved to ask for the publication of the Council of Trent, with the usual reservations. He remarks thereon, The third estate was strongly opposed to it. He expected much good from the proposed marriages. He hoped the Clergy & Noblesse would petition the King to favour the Jesuits, and to allow the reestablishment of their colleges in Paris. Dated Paris, 18 December 1614. Folio 374. Deciphered 2 January 1615.

138. Stating that Rambouillet had written, that he had obtained the Duke of Savoy's consent to the new conditions improved by the King, and had communicated it to the Governor of Milan, who replied that he was ordered by Spain to come to no terms with Savoy. The Duke, not sorry for this refusal, had now requested the promised succours from France. He [the nuncio] had been requested to desire the nuncio of Spain to interpose his good offices, to prevent a rupture. Rambouillet would be recalled, as it was now intended to carry on the negotiation in Spain. The affair of Juliers was again thrown into uncertainty by the conduct of Spinola and Maurice: he remarks thereon. He mentions the proceedings of Don Inico [Spanish Ambassador], and the proposals to defer the marriages two years. He had just heard that England had offered Savoy 4000 troops, or money to pay that number. Dated Paris, 18 December 1614. Folio 376.

139. Stating that his Holiness' threats had had effect; the King had suspended the decree of the Parliament, condemnatory of Father Suarez' book, on condition however, that the Pope should censure the pernicious proposition that the persons of Kings, condemned by Councils, might be attacked. He [the nuncio] could have wished this remark absent. He thought no further concession could be gained. If the Pope should approve of his censure, it ought to be printed, and circulated to the nuncios, and, especially, in England. The suspension was not yet publicity known, but was suspected. Dated Paris, 18 December 1614. Folio 378. Deciphered 2 January 1615.

140. Respecting a dispensation, to allow the Marshal Ladighiera [François de Bonne, Duke of Lesdiguières], to marry the Marchioness of Trefort. Dated Paris, 18 December 1614. Folio 380. Deciphered 2 January 1615.

T. Original letters of various Ecclesiastical personages.

141. From Cardinal Lodovico Madruzio, [Bishop of Trent] to the Cardinal of St. Sisto [Ugo Buoncompagno, afterwards Pope Gregory XIII], on the collection of Alms for the support of the Hospital of St. Antony. Dated Trent, 5 December 1579. (Latin). With his seal. Folio 382.

142. From Pietro Millino [nuncio in Spain] to Pietro Aldobrandini [afterwards Cardinal]; stating that he had had an audience of the King of Spain, and had strongly enforced the necessity of carrying on the war in France, in support of the League. he had also pointed out the great fault committed, in attempting with one commander and one army, both to defend Flanders and support the League. It was reported, the Mansfelt was in France, at the head of a large army, with orders to deliver Paris, and support the election of a Catholic King. Dated Madrid, 30 January 1593. (Italian). Folio 384.

143. From the Cardinal Patriarch of Alexandria [Ottavio Pallavicino] to His Holiness [Clement VIII]; respecting the Order of Observantines of St. Francis, and the Election of a General and commissary of the Order, at which he had presided. Dated Madrid, 2 July, 1593. (Italian). Folio 386. Endorsed, apparently by the Pope, as referred ‘à Pietro’ [Cardinal Pietro Aldobrandini].

144. From the same to Cardinal [Pietro] Aldobrandini; giving an account of the audience which His Excellency Giov. Francesco [blank] had had of the King. The obstacles raised by the inquisition to the publication of the Jubilee, were overcome. Dated Madrid, 12 February 1595. (Italian). Folio 392.

145. From the same to [the same?]; giving an account of the dangerous illness of the King, with a summary of the state of affairs. Dated Madrid, 8 August 1595. (Italian). Folio 394.

146. From Minutio [de' Minuzzi] Archbishop of Zara, to the Bishop of Molfeta [Placido di Marra], at Venice; respecting one of his canons, who had appealed from his jurisdiction to the Patriarchal Court at Venice, which had no power over the See of Zara, that being metropolitan, and subject only to the Holy See. He requests the Bishop's good offices with Cardinal Prink [Patriarch of Venice], and at Rome. Dated Zara, 29 July, 1599. (Italian). Folio 396.

147. A letter written under feigned names by the Patriarch of Venice [Cardinal Prink?] to Cardinal Aldobrandini; detailing the intrigues of the Spanish Ambassador, to keep the Cardinal out of Rome. Without date, but written probably while the Cardinal was negotiating the peace of La Bresses. (Italian). With a key. Folio 398.

148. From Alexis [de Menezes], Archbishop of Goa, and Primate of the East Indies, to Pope Clement VIII; giving a full account of the Bishopric and Church of Angamalle, on the coast of Malabar. Dated Goa [between 1592 and 1605.] (Latin). With his seal. Folio 401.

149. From the same to the same; giving a detailed account of the several churches under the Metropolitan See of Goa. Dated Goa, 28 December 1599. (Latin). With his seal. Folio 407.

150. From Don Arachieli, Catholic of all Armenia, and Patriarch of Vacorcsciaba and Ecimiazin, to Don Leonardo [dash], Papal nuncio at Jerusalem; a letter of compliment, excusing himself from going in person to Jerusalem; he sends in his stead his spiritual son and secretary, Don Giovanni Vartabet. Dated in the City of Amit, in the church of S. Ciriaco, in the year [of the Armenian Era] 1034, November 13. (Armenian). Folio 414.

151. An Italian translation of the preceding letter. Folio 415.

152. From John Pistorius to the Cardinal of St. Giorgio [Cinthio Passeri, afterwards Aldobrandini, nephew of Clement VIII]; thanking him for his patronage, with regard to the Bishopric of Augsburg. Dated Constance, 9 January 1595. (Latin). Folio 417.

153. From the same to the same; on the affair of the Bishopric which had been given to another, by the influence of the Cardinal Madruzio. He mentions his own service to the Church of Rome, and says, that five years had elapsed since the promise made to him by Pope Urban (after the conversation by his means of the Prince James), that he might expect the first vacant See in Germany. This promise had been renewedby all Pope Urban's successors. Dated Constance, 23 January 1595. (Latin). With his seal. Folio 419.

154. From the same to the same, cheifly on the same subjects. Dated Constance XVII. Kal. April 1595. (Latin). Folio 421.

155. From the same to the same; on the support of the Catholic Religion in the Margravate of Baden; and on the family of Zoller. Dated Siegmaringen, St. John's day, 1595. (Latin). Folio 423.

156. From the same to the same; on a disputation at Zurich with the Calvanists, and on various ecclesiastical affairs. Dated Rostock, VI Non. May 1598. (Latin). Folio 425.

157. From Dominico [de' Ginnasi] Archbishop of Sipontino [afterwards Cardinal], nuncio in Spain, to Cardinal Aldobrandini; on the affairs of Flanders; he mentions a supposed conspiracy of the Moors to invite the Turk to attack Spain; the miraculous bell at Beliglia in Aragon [see Cayet, Chronol. Septen., page 233]. The Spanish complained of the assistance afforded by the French to the rebels in Flanders. The plague was very bad at Seville. Dated Vagliad [Valladolid] 12 July, 1601. (Italian). Folio 429.

158. From the Rector and University of Louvain to Pope Clement VIII; requesting that the proceedings may be stayed, which Marcello Lautes, the apostolic prothonotary and auditor of the Papal Chamber, had instituted against Arnold al Eynhouts, Abbot of St. Gertrude, and conservator of the privileges of the University. Dated Louvain, 24 July, 1604. (Latin). Folio 431.

159. From Giovanni Dominica la Ravenna, Inquisitor at Venice, to Cardinal Borghese [nephew of Pope Paul V] at Rome; on the means adopted to prevent an ordination at this time by the Patriarchal Vicar, and the celebration of a Provincial Chapter in the consistory of the Servites, where Frà Paolo (Sarpi) resided, which had been intended to shew that his excommunication was not a matter of importance. Dated Venice. 15 September 1607. (Italian). Folio 433.

160. From Cardinal Frederick Borromeo to the same; stating that Ottavio Cusano, who was of scandalous life, intended to appeal from the Cardinal Metropolitan jurisdiction to the Segnatura at Rome, in order to obtain a remission of his cause to the Bishop of Ladi, suffragan to the See of Milan. The Cardinal remonstrates against this, and refers for particulars to his agent at Rome. Dated Milan, 13 November 1608. (Italian). Folio 435.

161. From Peter Colonus to Lorenzo de' Paoli, a Jesuit at Rome; giving an account of the burning before the Palace of the nuncio at Paris of the Pseudo Borghese [Bartholomeo Labcesque, who called himself son of Pope Paul V]; his amanuensis [Arena] was condemned to the Gallies. He mentions several affairs relating to the Church of Lyons. Dated Paris, 25 November 1608. (Latin). Folio 437.[See Rigaltins De rebus Gallicis, page I (at the end of De Thou's history), and L'Etoile, Journal de Henri IV, volume iii, pages 472, 483. See also Sloane MS 159, art. 2 and a small volume without date or name of printer in the museum library [British Museum, now British Library], intitled ‘De Paulo V. perditionis filio Barthol. Borghesium fililum suum perdente’.

162. Brief of Pope Paul V appointing Vincenzo Gonzaga [afterwards Duke of Mantua] a Cardinal Deacon; all defects of age, orders, or other causes notwithstanding. Dated Rome, 4 August 1616. (Latin), on vellum, with part of the seal. Folio 439.

163. From Cardinal Vincenzo Gonzaga to Pope Paul V thanking him for the dignity of Cardinal, just conferred; stating that he had sent his secretary to return his thanks to the Pope in person, and requesting the favour may be granted which the secretary would ask in his name. Dated Mantua, 27 August 1616. (Italian). Folio 440.

164. From Tullio Domini [apparently nuncio in Spain] to Cardinal Aldobrandini; containing an account of the sentence passed upon Don Rodrigo Calderon; and of the interest made with the King [Philip IV] to procure a remission; together with particulars of the promotions made by the new King, and of those who were banished from the Court. Dated Madrid, 19 July 1621. (Italian), partly in cipher. Folio 442.

U. Original letters from Frà Bonaventura Calatagirona, general of the Zoccolanti of Franciscans, afterwards Patriarch of Constantinople.

165. To Cardinal [Pietro] Aldobrandini; referring to a former letter and to an enclosed paper, for what had transpired since his arrival. Dated Paris, 25 May 1597. (Italian). Folio 445.

166. To the same; giving an account of the audience which he had had of the King [Henry IV] respecting the proposed peace between France and Spain. Dated Paris, 25 May 1597. (Italian). Folio 447. A copy: endorsed, deciphered 17th June.

167. To the same; enclosing a duplicate of his letter of the 4th and giving an account of what had occurred to this time. The King was besieging Amiens; the writer was going the next day to Brussels. Dated Pichigny, 20 July 1597. (Italian). Folio 449.

168. To the same; giving an account of his audience of the King [Henri IV] in which he prefers the conclusion of a treaty of peace with Spain, and discusses the particulars of it. Dated 20 July 1597. (Italian). Folio 451. A transcript, endorsed 'deciphered 12 August'. Much corroded by the ink.

169. To the same; referring to his letter of the 23rd February and also to an enclosed letter in cipher. Dated Vervin, 6 March, 1598. (Italian). Folio 455.

170. To the same; giving an account of the proceedings of the congress held at Vervin, for negotiating a peace. Dated 6 March, 1598. (Italian) Folio 457. Endorsed as deciphered 27 March; it is probably a transcript of the cipher mentioned in the preceding.

171. To the Cardinal of St. Giorgio [Cinthio Aldobrandini]; stating that he had heard of the safe arrival of his letters, and that he was now to address himself to the Cardinal of St. Giorgio, whom he compliments, and refers to an enclosure in cipher. Dated Vervin, 26 March, 1598. (Italian). Folio 461.

172. To the same; respecting the terms of the treaty propounded between the King of France and the Duke of Savoy. Dated Vervin, 26 March, 1598. (Italian). Folio 463. A copy; endorsed as deciphered 8th April. It is probably a transcript of the cipher mentioned in the preceding.

173. To Cardinal [Pietro] Aldobrandini; enclosing a letter in cipher, to which he refers. Dated Vervin, 16 April 1598. (Italian). Folio 467.

174. To the same; chiefly in cipher; the letter alluded to in the preceding. Dated Vervin, 16 April 1598. (Italian). Folio 469.

175. To the same; detailing the further steps taken in the negotiation for peace between France, Spain, and Savoy. Dated Vervin, 16 April 1598. (Italian). Folio 470. A copy endorsed as deciphered 9 May, it is probably a transcript of the preceding.

176. To the same; enclosing a duplicate of the last letter, and a further account, in cipher. He was going the next day to Vervin. Dated Brussels, 23 April, 1598. (Italian). Folio 472.

177. To the same; partly in cipher, being the enclosure referred to in the last. Dated Brussels, 23 April, 1598. (Italian). Folio 474.

178. To the same; mentioning the return of the President Richardot from Brussels to Vervin, with the Cardinal Archduke's answer, and detailing the proceedings of the congress thereupon. Dated Brussels, 23 April, 1598. (Italian). Folio 475. A transcript, endorsed as deciphered 9 May.

179. To Pope Clement VIII congratulating His Holiness on the conclusion of a peace by mediation of the Holy See. Dated Vervin, 2 May 1598. (Latin). Folio 477.

180. To Cardinal [Pietro] Aldobrandini; giving an account of the movements of negotiators, after the conclusion of the treaty of peace. Dated Vervin, 14 May 1598. (Italian). Folio 479.

181. From the same, now Patriarch of Constantinople, to the same; referring to an enclosure for information. He was going the next day to Paris. A new English ambassador had arrived. Dated Fontainebleau, 24 May 1599. (Italian). Folio 481.

182. The enclosure referred to in the last, respecting the articles of peace with Savoy, and the negotiation for the exchange of Saluzzo for la Bresse. (Italian). Folio 483.

183. To the same; referring to his despatches from Fontainebleau, and to an enclosed letter in cipher. Dated Paris, 27 May 1599. (Italian). Folio 486.

184. To the same; on the negotiation respecting the exchange of Saluzzo for La Bresse. He had had an audience of the King thereupon, of which he gives the particulars. The King had requested his interest in the case of his marriage. Dated Paris, 27 May, 1599. (Italian). Folio 488. A copy; endorsed as deciphered 9 June, it is most probably a transcript of the cipher mentioned in the preceding.

185. To the same? on the same subjects. Dated 12 June, 1599. (Italian). Folio 490.

186. To the same; that he had received the Cardinal's letter of the 15th June, with the paper in cipher, in consequence of which, he had postponed his audience of the King, and had come to Orleans, to treat with MM. de Bellièvre and Villeroy. The Duke of Mercœur was going to Hungary. He refers to some enclosed despatches in cipher. Dated Orleans, 23 July, 1599. Folio 492.

187. A paper in cipher. Dated Orleans, 23 July 1599, being the despatches alluded to in the preceding. Folio 494.

188. To the same; giving an account of what passed at his audience of the King, respecting the proposed league against the Turks, the dissolution of the King's marriage, and the treaty with the Duke of Savoy to exchange La Bresse for the Marquisate of Saluzzo. Dated Orleans, 23 July, 1599. (Italian). Folio 496. A copy; deciphered 4 August, most probably a transcript of the preceding; much corroded by the ink.

189. To the same? giving an account of his audience of the Duke of Savoy, at the Chambery, relating to the exchange of Saluzzo and La Bresse. Dated Dalla Madonna de Amian, 13 May, 1600. (Italian). Folio 500. A copy; deciphered 8 June.